|  |  |
In the United States, the first modern Father's Day celebration was held on July 5, 1908, in Fairmont, West Virginia[29][30] or on June 19th of the same year, in the state of Washington[31]. Today, Father's Day is celebrated on the 3rd Sunday of June.
In West Virginia, it was first celebrated as a church service at Williams Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church South, now known as Central United Methodist Church. Grace Golden Clayton, who is believed to have suggested the service to the pastor, is believed to have been inspired to celebrate fathers after the deadly mine explosion in nearby Monongah the prior December. This explosion killed 361 men, many of them fathers and recent immigrants to the United States from Italy. Another possible inspiration for the service was Mothers' Day, which had been celebrated for the first time two months prior in Grafton, West Virginia, a town about 15 miles (24 km) away.
Another driving force behind the establishment of the integration of Father's Day was Mrs. Sonora Smart Dodd, born in Creston, Washington. Her father, the Civil War veteran William Jackson Smart, was a single parent reared his six children in Spokane, Washington. She was inspired by Anna Jarvis's efforts to establish Mother's Day. Although she initially suggested June 5, her father's birthday, she did not provide the organizers with enough time to make arrangements, and the celebration was deferred to the third Sunday of June. The first June Father's Day was celebrated on June 19, 1910, in Spokane, WA, at the Spokane YMCA.
Unofficial support from such figures as William Jennings Bryan was immediate and widespread. President Woodrow Wilson was personally feted by his family in 1916. President Calvin Coolidge recommended it as a national holiday in 1924. In 1966, President Lyndon Johnson made Father's Day a holiday to be celebrated on the third Sunday of June. The holiday was not officially recognized until 1972, during the presidency of Richard Nixon.
In recent years, retailers have adapted to the holiday by promoting greeting cards and male-oriented gifts such as electronics and tools. Schools and other children's programs commonly have activities to make Father's Day gifts.
According to IBISWorld, a publisher of business research, Americans are expected to spend at least $11 billion on gifts for Father's Day in 2008. This is about $7 billion less than the amount spent on Moms for Mother's Day, which is more steeped in traditional gifts, some of which tend to be more expensive than Father's Day gifts. In economic terms, the average per capita spending on Father's Day is expected to be in the range of $27.60 in 2008. [32]. |  |  | | Used and New: | | |
| All | |
| $74.95+ $4.99 *Shipping | New | | | $79.99 This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. | New | | | $80.99 This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. | Used
- VeryGood | |
| New | |
| $74.95+ $4.99 *Shipping | New | | | $79.99 This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. | New | |
| Used | |
| $80.99 This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. | Used
- VeryGood | |
 | | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Don't Bother with this paritcular product from Q-E!!!! Feb 17, 2010 I had ordered this for my wife for Xmas, received on-time no problem. Getting it to work was another story. Loaded the software that came with it, got a few picture loaded. Had trouble from the begining to get it to turn on. Displayed a few pics for awhile, then it went dead. Do not purchase this brand online. I went to Brookstone's after Xmas and they had there version and model on sale for $69.99. It works like a champ, no problems and my wife loves it.
So beautiful, yet so ugly Jan 31, 2010 I ordered this as a gift. My plan was to load up an album on an SD card and give it to my mother-in-law who travels often on business, and then send her new SD cards every few months to update her photo album as her grandchildren grew. If not for its fatal ugliness, this unit would have been a beautiful gift. After a few frustrating days, I returned it.
The beautiful: It is the sort of design I almost expected to find an Apple logo hidden somewhere. It's sleek and compact with a screen big enough to show the pictures yet small enough to fit in a purse. The 600x800 resolution is perfect for the size so the display looks really good.
The bad: It had lots of problems displaying my pictures. The "documentation" was small and trivial, although it might have been valuable if I didn't already know how to plug in a wall transformer. Online help? Hah! Clearly I was on my own. My pictures were a mixture of digital snapshots, edited digital snapshots, and a few scanned photos. Some photos of each type displayed well, while others showed up with badly distorted colors and patterns. I've seen these types of problems before when a large image is crudely down-sampled for display. Not to worry, I'll just edit them all and re-size to 600x800, right? Wrong. Half the edited photos--all written in the same format from the same software, at the right resolution, won't display. The picture frame doesn't even show they exist.
I tried downloading the pictures directly via USB as well as using the SC card. No luck. The more I tried to adapt to whatever this thing's problem is, the worse it got.
My conclusion: A beautiful design, so poorly executed as to make it worthless.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Not as pictured Dec 17, 2009 I'm not sure if this is a knock-off of the OVO photo viewer, but the item I received has the logo "Q:Electronics" on the front. The button configuration is also different from that shown in the picture. I intended to give it as a gift, but now feel I need to investigate further. On first impression, the logo is very unattractive and the buttons feel cheap. I am more concerned that the quality is not as described since the outside is close, but not quite the same. Very misleading images.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Not worth the effort Dec 01, 2009 This item looked great and the photos were great to look at. However, each time I added photos I had to reinstall the software, and it never was able to read my memory card, which was in the correct format. I returned the item. Definitely not worth the aggravation or the price.
4 of 4 found the following review helpful:
Good, but could have been better Nov 05, 2009 I was looking for a basic photo viewer about this size for my wife. Her basic requirements are portability and ease of use. I ran into some trouble right away. The Photo Viewer software would not run properly on my PC (Vista 64-bit). There is very little documentation, and no online support. I tried to get a newer version of Photo Viewer online, but no dice. I finally had to load it to another PC (which meant transferring the pictures to that PC too). Photo Viewer does work, but with some quirks. The photos are not necessarily loaded in the order you choose them. My wife chuckled at some incongruous juxtapositions. On the bright side, once the pictures were loaded, it was very easy to use.
Pluses: nice pictures, light, easy to use the Photo Frame.
Minuses: Awkward transfer software, a little pricey
|
|  | |